Comments on: Virtual Earth Control 100% height problem – Solved! Well almost http://www.earthware.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/08/virtual-earth-control-100-height-problem-solved-well-almost/ Interactive Mapping Blog Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:31:18 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: info http://www.earthware.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/08/virtual-earth-control-100-height-problem-solved-well-almost/comment-page-1/#comment-6695 info Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:54:39 +0000 http://www.earthware.co.uk/blog/?p=71#comment-6695 Thanks Deuce, We are working with the same framework etc as you except we are using .net 3.5 sp1 but I doubt that would make a difference. What browsers were your trying? I have reported that the community is having problems with this to the dev team so hopefully we might get a response Thanks Deuce,

We are working with the same framework etc as you except we are using .net 3.5 sp1 but I doubt that would make a difference. What browsers were your trying?

I have reported that the community is having problems with this to the dev team so hopefully we might get a response

]]> By: deuce4 http://www.earthware.co.uk/blog/index.php/2008/08/virtual-earth-control-100-height-problem-solved-well-almost/comment-page-1/#comment-6694 deuce4 Sun, 21 Sep 2008 05:55:23 +0000 http://www.earthware.co.uk/blog/?p=71#comment-6694 Didn't work for me. The map opened wide and doesn't resize at all with this code. Perhaps it is confiuration dependent? I use VS 2008 with all the latest Net 3.5 etc. I spent quite a few hours working on solutions similar to this one. Probably just best to wait for the next release of the control, though I have not yet seen Micorsoft awknowledge the problem. Definitely a bug. Didn’t work for me. The map opened wide and doesn’t resize at all with this code. Perhaps it is confiuration dependent? I use VS 2008 with all the latest Net 3.5 etc.

I spent quite a few hours working on solutions similar to this one. Probably just best to wait for the next release of the control, though I have not yet seen Micorsoft awknowledge the problem.

Definitely a bug.

]]>